categorizing

'holy'days abandoned acts advertising apologetics Apple art athiesm audio authenticity Baptism Bible Bible study blogging books CCM Christianity Christian season church church planting commentaries Communion community compassion international concert contextualization cross culture discipleship economics editorial education electronica emerging church emerging culture environment eschatoloty evangelism examining extract'd family fatherhood food futurism Gospel health hermeneutics history homosexuality humor hymns incarnational independent music kingdom of God language leadership leading liturgy media meme ministry missio Dei missiology missional church missional living missions mobap movies multi-ethnic multi-site music my favorite songs news New Testament orthopraxy parenting pastoring philosophy photography picture planning poetry politics post-Christian post-Evangelical postmodern prayer preaching Psalms q & a quotes of note radio reflections relationships relevintage religion research resurrection reverse-engineering review roaring lambs sacraments sacred space science seminar sermons social issues social justice social networking songwriting sports technology television the 7 the art of... theatre theology tithing travel twitter Uncategorized vacation video vision vodcast web web 2.0 world issues worship

promoting

Click here to subscribe to Bible Study Magazine!

licensing

Unless otherwise noted at the end of a post, all content here is covered by the following copyright:

content top round

I just watched the recent debate between Alister McGrath, Professor of Historical Theology at Oxford University, author of Dawkins’ God and The Dawkins Delusion and Peter Atkins, Professor of Chemistry at Oxford University, well-known atheist and supporter of Richard Dawkins.

It is a very interesting debate by two heavyweights. I’m still trying to wrap my head around the give-and-take.

I’m going to break down the main points I think McGrath and Atkins are making and the strengths/weaknesses within them in the upcoming weeks. I know, I’m in way in over my head…

My thought is that for my generation, this is basically a new debate, insomuch as we are coming of age where competing ideas on the existence of God – or lack thereof – are needing to be dealt/be confronted with for the first time within our generation. Older generations have been debating this for a long time. We inherently know it is an ‘old’ debate, but for anyone growing up in these postmodern times, it is basically a novel discussion.

You can watch the debate if you are interested here. I look forward to the discussion…

[HT: challies.com]


about me

posting

commenting

archiving

recommending

supporting

international justice mission

bloodwater mission

invisible children

to write love on her arms

kiva micro loans

compassion international

analyzing